• hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was explaining how they’re the same. You know, for someone who likes explaining the obvious, you really did miss out on this obvious point being made, twice.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So because the US vetoed a measure earlier, them proposing a ceasefire now is grounds for Russia/China to veto?

          You sound like someone who thinks “no u” is a strong argument.

          • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            They vetoing it because the US proposed a conditional ceasefire while Russia and China want an immediate unconditional ceasefire.