A 6th grade girls team from Kentucky was set to go for the year-end championship tournament, but was told they were banned due to fears boys teams might ‘retaliate’ if they lost to the girls team.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s not why they were kicked out. The coach lied, to get them playing in the boys league, since they were so good.
    So of course they got kicked out. What you expect the league to do?

    He explained:
    “In November of 2023, Next Level and Larry McGraw deceptively registered a girls team into the 6th grade boys league and under the gender listed as MALE.”
    “We entered them into the league assuming they were a boys’ team as conveniently no roster was ever provided.”
    “Subsequently, their first game was filled in by a boys 6th grade Next Level team because they played the 6th grade boys Cincinnati Royals team - coached by myself, so there was no reason to suspect anything different.”

    He continued:
    “It wasn’t until late January/early February that several teams from the 6th-grade division started traveling down to Kentucky to play their scheduled games, that it became apparent that the Next Level team was, in fact, a girls team.”
    “Several complaints from coaches and teams were filed because of this deception.”

    Social media users, however, saw SWOB’s statement as deflecting from another issue, one that accused the league of trying to keep their feelings from getting hurt in the event the boys were defeated by girls.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It wasn’t until late January/early February that several teams from the 6th grade division started traveling down to Kentucky to play their scheduled games, that it became apparent that the Next Level team was, in fact, a girls team. Several complaints from coaches and teams were filed because of this deception.

      At that point we allowed the team to finish the regular season schedule, but would move them into a girls’ tourney at year end.

      This is a direct quote from the Southwestern Ohio Basketball website.

      They allowed the girls to play until the end of the season in the boy’s category, so your take on it is incorrect.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In the statement on their website, Sunderman literally quotes himself telling McGraw that the girls couldn’t play because if they beat a boys team in the playoffs then the boys might get frustrated and physically retaliate, causing a liability issue.

      He didn’t say they couldn’t play because they registered as a boys team. That was more of a supporting anecdote presented because of social media blowback.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Even if you are technically right, you are morally wrong. They should be allowed to register in that league, and if they weren’t then the coach lying about their gender was the correct and moral thing to do.

      Crazy to watch people twist themselves in knots bending over backwards to try and excuse sexism.

      But I don’t even think you are technically right. All those quotes stink like excuses and BS.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      that is some selective bullshit

      Seriously. What this tells me is that 70+ people either didn’t read the article or they just really have a thing about mixed gender sports. You quoted only the pathetic backpedalling lies he said to try to further justify his actions. BUT FIRST AND FOREMOST he said this (the man you are quoting, Sunderland, is the president)

      The city-wide basketball league, Southwestern Ohio Basketball (SWOB), made the call because they believed that 11 to 12-year-old girls and boys competing against each other on the court could pose a liability risk leading to violence, even though the girls team had been winning 7-1 all season without incident.

      IT IS WHY THEY WERE KICKED OUT.

      It wasn’t until late January/early February that several teams from the 6th-grade division started traveling down to Kentucky to play their scheduled games, that it became apparent that the Next Level team was, in fact, a girls team.

      You’re telling me it took multiple games AND teams for them to become "apparent that it was a girls team " ??? And become a problem. But only until they got far enough because maybe they wouldn’t and then SWOB could avoid PR problem all together.

      this is a reminder to read the fucking article people

      You might come up with a similar conclusion as me, or completely opposite. But OP is patently false and deceptive with their quote and definitive ruling on it, claiming the headline is deceptive! Fuck that.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You might have quoted the wrong part. This is what you’re looking for:

        Doing this 28 years, what we have worried about is a boys team losing to a girls team (especially in the year end tourney), they may get frustrated and retaliate against a girl. Then we have liability issues.”

        Also it looks like the guts of the article is the media statement here:

        https://www.swohiosports.com/

        It’s a daft thing to say, and just pours fuel on the conflagration, but it does reveal some insights into the character of the guy.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      So if I understand it correctly, it’s a boys only competition, not an open competition. And since these girls were so good, they wanted to be able to compete against the top teams, so they pulled of a superb ruse to be able to do just that, in the process upsetting some men who don’t want to compete against girls for reasons, especially if they end up losing. That’s going to make a good sport movie one day.

      Many (most?) sports have a top “open” competition that anyone can enter and then several restricted competitions (age, sex, handicaps, …), but even if you qualify for one of the restricted competitions, if you’re good enough, you can still play in the open competition. Except in bible belt country apparently, no girls allowed in the top competition.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He also said it wasn’t unheard of for a girl to play on a boys’ team or for a girls’ team to compete against boys.

        It sounds like it’s not a boys only competition. It’s not entirely clear whether this quote is just referring to in general or this specific league, but based on the context the latter appears to be the intended reading.

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        These are 6th graders. There’s no “top” competition for 6th graders at all, which is why this is a region specific league, and most of the sports are divided into boys and girls divisions at those ages.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        LoL. Lemmy is definitely feels over reals so far. And my feeling appreciates that.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Oh, great idea, but I was just guessing, I don’t read articles, only what other people think, and then I just go with that.

              The headline is correct, but it doesn’t tell the whole story was my point you absolute doofus.

              • olympicyes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Did you read the article (and linked statements) or not? The league stated the reason the girls couldn’t play and that reason that a boy might not be able to handle avoiding hitting a girl if they lose. None of this would be an issue if the girls weren’t winning. I don’t buy for a second that nobody noticed all season that they were losing to girls.

                • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You mean the blog post on “comicsands.com”?

                  And this erudite take by “Prez, a social media user on X (Formerly Twitter)”, who “didn’t buy it”?

                  Yes, I did! Multiple times, unfortunately!

                  It’s ridiculous to be so ready to fall for populist propaganda when you just happen to be on the self-congratulatory team, but the mode of thinking is the exact same as employed by MAGA freaks.

                  Your lack of critical thinking makes you just as bad as them.

                  • olympicyes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I already told you that I clicked through to other posts as well as the statement from the league. What else is there to parse. If you don’t like the blog that is linked, feel free to post a different one. People like you are interesting to me, so quick to insult people online, arrogantly making judgements. I bet you’d be really nice to me in person. https://www.swohiosports.com/