• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Only a crisis - actual or perceived - produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. That, I believe, is our basic function: to develop alternatives to existing policies, to keep them alive and available until the politically impossible becomes the politically inevitable.

      -Milton Friedman

  • PP_BOY_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is just capitalism working as intended. The fact that these price increases are being sold as some kind of abnormality is some real neolib brain in action. It isn’t “greedflation,” it’s literally the same capitalism we’ve lived with for centuries.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      And then go one step further and realize it’s always been shit. The only time the world has been great has been when kings and capitalism are on a VERY short leash.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It isn’t “greedflation,” it’s literally the same capitalism we’ve lived with for centuries.

      You’re both absolutely right and very wrong: it by definition IS greedflation, inflated prices due to greed.

      While it is indeed caused by the same capitalist system we’ve lived with for centuries, it’s getting much worse than it has been now that the billionaires and their corporations have realized that there’s no consequences even when their profiteering is so blatant that even the likes of Forbes and WSJ are having to acknowledge what they’ve been able to distract from before.

      • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        There is no penalties for collision. Regulation should prevent but since politicians are owned and there’s zero effort at enforcment here we are.

      • PP_BOY_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s no such thing as greed in capitalism, though. Rather, greed is the understood foundation from which capitalism is based on. It only works when there is greed. Companies shouldn’t avoid raising their prices because they don’t want more money, they’re supposed to (in capitlism). The system only works when they raise their prices as much as the market will bear.

        My grevience with the term “Greedflation” popping up so much recently is that it feels like a cop-out from the current administration to ease economic anxiety without replacing or criticizing the overall economic model. It paints price hikes as a one-time, circumstantial “quirk” of our times, instead of the logical realization of capitalism that it is.

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ive no idea why this is downvoted. This is not a bad take.

          I would personally frame it as, greed is a feature of capitalism, not a bug, but ur not wrong either.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      When you say “neolib” are you referring the Neoliberal economic philosophy, or some slang term for modern political liberals?

      I ask because Neoliberal Economics is all about this profit, and share holders first, type values. This is in contrast to the post Great Depression, Classical Economics philosophy where companies valued employees first, and shareholders last.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I ask because Neoliberal Economics is all about this profit, and share holders first, type values.

        Sounds exactly like modern political liberals to me.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Really?

          Most Democrat Politicians today certainly are on board. But they were late to buy in. The Republicans actually introduced Neoliberal Economics into politics, chiefly with Ronald Regan.

          Today it’s mostly the liberal side of the Democratic Party that introduces legislation to curb all the excesses of Neoliberal Economics.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course they did. We know they did. All you have to do is go back and read their quarterly earnings calls from 2020 to basically now and they told their shareholders clearly that they were using the pandemic as an excuse to increase profits.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s the unfettered capitalism Reagan delivered to his cronies, which ofc trickled down to the whole fucking world.

      • seth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        I love self-checkout. I’ve only gone through a regular checkout line about a dozen times when self-checkout was available at a store but backed up, and haven’t had a single fast or good experience. The small talk is depressing, they’re so much slower at scanning and keying in produce codes I’ve memorized by now, their bagging strategy is always abysmal, and unless the line is empty (which, it almost never is), you have not just 1 but 2 people to throw a wrench in the gears of getting checked out. About a quarter of the time the buyer in front doesn’t have any basic estimate of how much the stuff they’re trying to buy costs, and they end up putting back milk, eggs, and produce but keeping the pack of cigarettes when the card is rejected.

        The waiting isn’t nearly as bad as the bagging, honestly. I would never put a carton of eggs in its own bag when there are loaves of bread or bags of chips lined up right behind it on the belt. I would never mix refrigerated foods in the same bag as drain cleaner, or go willy nilly mixing pantry items in paper packaging with frozen foods.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        … self-care out.

        And yes, we definitely should realize how brainwashed we are to always think of the poor extremely rich people.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    … you can’t seriously build a system that is meant to take advantage of every situation, praise if for taking advantage of every situation, align it’s interests in taking advantage of every situation and then be surprised it took advantage of a situation. We should be better than Pikachu.

  • Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everyone keeps saying this is capitalism and its true. Companies squeezing everyone when they’re vulnerable for more profits.

    Consumers need protections for things like basic needs so we don’t struggle just to survive.

    Food and housing should be protected. Luxury brands can get all the profit they want.

    Don’t touch my fucking groceries and rent!

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Are you saying human quality of life is more important than (strictly financial) profits?? I’m thought that is blasphemy and that I must shame you for it. How dare.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This is why giant supermarkets are bad. When you have a choice of several places to buy, they compete.

      Rent though has been captured by optimisation software. Your rent goes up because a computer predicted you (or someone else) would pay more.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nothing happens to Corporations around here. It was pretty clear it was greed even before the data hit.

  • taanegl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    See, it’s very simple. You create a massive monopoly/duopoly/triopoly, to undercut, out compete and otherwise dominate small businesses, until they’ve been fazed out… then once it’s only you, and you decide the pricing, then you start screwing around with prices while politicians twiddle their thumbs.

  • Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is this even news, ofc they did, give them an inch and they always take a mile, war, recessions and sickness are always a profiteering venture for business.

    • ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t think of your death as failure; think of it as fun! Don’t think of Wal-Mart’s price hikes as war profiteering, think of them as war… fun!

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s fair, though. They raised the salaries of the people who worked there.

    Right?